Plan to Give D.C. a Vote in Congress Advances
Thursday, May 11, 2006 By Lori Montgomery and Elissa Silverman The Washington Post
WASHINGTON--Del. Eleanor Holmes Norton, D-D.C., is teaming up with U.S. Rep. Tom Davis, R-Va., to introduce a bill that would for the first time give Washington D.C. a full vote in Congress, a sign of bipartisan cooperation that advocates of D.C. voting rights hailed as a breakthrough.
The legislation, set to be unveiled at a news conference Thursday, would expand the House from 435 to 437 seats, giving a vote to Washington as well as a fourth vote to Utah, the state next in line to enlarge its congressional delegation based on the 2000 Census.
Davis first introduced a version of the bill two years ago, but he struggled to persuade Norton and House Democrats to support it. Through a spokeswoman, Norton declined Thursday to discuss her change of heart, promising to explain all at the news conference.
"We have an agreement in principle with our Democrats, and that's a significant development," said Davis spokesman David Marin. "It's no secret that legislation to give the District a vote wasn't going to go too far without Eleanor Holmes Norton on board."
Advocates of D.C. voting rights also said Norton's sponsorship of the bill was an important development.
"We're excited about this. This represents a lot of movement," said Kevin Kiger, communications director for D.C. Vote, a nonprofit organization formed to pursue Washington representation in Congress. "If Norton is supporting this, we think it will bring Democrats on board. Davis and the Republicans will bring the Republicans on board. So we feel that this has a great chance of passing."
Kiger said that, if all goes smoothly, city residents could have a voting representative on the House floor as early as this fall.
Davis aides were somewhat less optimistic, acknowledging that the bill does not yet have the backing of House leaders. "You build momentum step by step," Marin said.
But Republican leaders have not ruled it out. A spokesman for House Majority Leader John Boehner, R-Ohio, said Wednesday that Boehner is "letting the committees work their will on this issue."
Davis has also raised the matter with President Bush, who opposes giving Washington a voice in the Senate. But when told in December that the Davis bill would only affect the House, Bush asked for more information, Davis said at the time.
Davis and Norton declined Wednesday to reveal details of the legislation. Sources familiar with the negotiations said the bill is likely to look very much like Davis' original proposal, with two significant changes.
The first would address Democratic worries about Utah by making the state's new seat a statewide position, rather than forming a new congressional district. Utah now has three House members, including one Democrat, Jim Matheson. House Democrats had worried that Utah Republicans, who control the statehouse, would use the extra seat to reconfigure the congressional districts and push Matheson out of his job. By making the fourth seat an at-large position, the three existing districts would remain intact.
The second expected change would make the expansion of the House permanent rather than temporary. Collapsing the House back to 435 members would have forced a state with declining population to sacrifice a representative to Washington.
Except for two years in the early 1990s, Washington has never had a voting voice in the House.
>From 1993 to 1995, Democratic House leaders permitted Norton and delegates from U.S. territories to vote in most cases, but only if their ballots did not affect the outcome. Norton lost even that limited right in 1995, when the Republicans took control.
In recent years, Norton has pushed for Washington D.C. statehood and a full complement of representatives on Capitol Hill, including two senators. Some voting-rights purists said they are disappointed that she appears to be backing away from that now.
"I just think it's passing strange that D.C. Delegate Eleanor Holmes Norton would undermine her own bill at this late date," said Timothy Cooper, executive director of Worldrights.
Ray Browne, Washington's shadow representative, said he believes Norton was swayed after learning that Davis had lined up enough Republican votes to move his bill through the Government Reform Committee, which he chairs, and the House Judiciary Committee. Faced with the possibility that Republicans would push forward without her, Browne said, Norton came aboard.
"Eleanor is doing it because she gets ownership," Browne said. "Eleanor was against this, against this, against this. ... (But) let her go to the head of the parade. It doesn't matter who gets the credit. It matters that the city gets the vote."